"What's a double blind test?:, you may ask. A double blind test is, by far, the primary statistical tool for testing the efficacity of medical drugs or of medical procedures.For example, a random sample of patients is selected. Half of them are treated by an experimental drug (or procedure); half, by a "placebo" (say, a sugar pill or trivial procedure). One part of the "double blind" is that the testees do not know how the "administrators" are treating them. The other part of the "double blind" is that a "judging" group of physicians examine the testees and judge their condition without knowing how they are treated. If a "statistically significant" number of them seem to improve, the drug (or procedure) may be considered eficacious; otherwise, not.
In constructing this test, I assume the role of the "administrators" in randoml distributing (below) descriptions of events in which a person was either intentionally slurred or bullied (homologous to drug or procedure), on the one hand, or the act was unintentional (homologous to "placebo"). You constitute part of the "judges". After reading the description -- and before clicking the eyelet -- decide if "intentional" or "unintentional". Then click to learn how I formulated it.
"How randomized?" In a randomized run of 50 numbers, if the nth number is odd, I select a case that is one way (intentional or nonintensional); if, even, the contrary of the former. No! I'm not telling you which is which. Also, it was a stratified sampling (another procedure currently in use in double blind testing). To those in the "know", this means the sampling was arranged so that the distribution was "half intentinal", "half nonintentional".
My point? That this daily situation of talking and making judgments and such is homologous to what mathematicians call a "function": MANY INPUTS FOR A SINGLE OUTPUT (MANY-ONE FUNCTION); or ONE INPUT FOR A SINGLE OUTPUT (ONE-ONE FUNCTION). I say it's also homologous to a vast field, "iatrogenic medicine", from the Greek "iatro-" for "self". Iatrogenic medicine deals with medical problems caused by medical practice. Say, you're hospitalized for an appendetomy and get a "staph" infection you didn't have before entering because of a failure in hospital sanitation. At other Websites, I'v files dealing with "iatromathematics" and "iatroscience".
My argument is that, by DEFAULT, what we say and do too often is homologous to a MANY-ONE FUNCTION because it doesn't matter whether a slur or hurting was INTENTIONAL or NOT: the effect on on the recipient is THE SAME. DOUBLE BLIND POLLING could motivate public responsibility for "unibtebtinal" injuries. Could heal citizenship.
An old adage says, "Ignorance of the Law is no excuse." After taking this TEST, see if you agree with me. And if agreement modifies your behavior. If you disagree or have corrections or suggestions, please e-mail them: haysjohnva@hotmail.com.
(Click eyelet to see description. Click "OK" to dismiss alert window.)